题目

 Explain whether Mo is entitled to payment from Katch Ltd in respect of the contract entered into by Len 

考点:Chapter18Companydirectors

 The circumstances in which Katch Ltd finds itself are very similar to that of the Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd 1964 case. Len has been allowed by the board to act as if he were Chief Execute Officer and therefore as a third party Mo is entitled to assume that he has the implied authority of one. This authority permits him to bind the company in commercial contracts, so the company will be bound by the advertising contract entered into by Len. Katch Ltd therefore has a liability to pay Mo or be sued for breach of contract. 

多做几道

 State whether Ian has any liability for money laundering 

 State whether Jet has any liability for money laundering 

材料全屏
36

【论述题】

 State whether Vic has any right to claim for the increase in share price that he missed out on when he sold his shares 

 Explain any criminal offences Sid may have committed 

材料全屏
38

【论述题】

 State what is meant by securities being 'price sensitive' in the context of insider dealing 

该科目易错题

该题目相似题